4.6 Article

Comparison of Portable Emissions Measurement Systems (PEMS) with Laboratory Grade Equipment

期刊

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
卷 8, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app8091633

关键词

Portable Emissions Measurement System (PEMS); Worldwide harmonized Light vehicles Test cycle (WLTC); Real Driving Emissions (RDE); conformity factor (CF); validation test; CO2; NOx; exhaust flow meter (EFM); measurement uncertainty

资金

  1. National Council of Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq-Brazil) [202097/2014-5]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Real-driving emissions (RDE) testing with portable emissions measurement systems (PEMS) during the type approval and in-service conformity of light-duty vehicles was recently introduced in the European Union legislation. In this paper, three PEMS were compared with laboratory analyzers connected to the tailpipe and the dilution tunnel. The tests were conducted with two Euro 6 vehicles (one gasoline and one diesel) performing the World harmonized Light vehicles Test Cycle (WLTC) and a pre-recorded RDE cycle on a chassis dynamometer. The results showed that the differences of the PEMS gas analyzers compared to the laboratory references were typically within 2% for CO2 and 5% for NOx. The CO2 and NOx mass emissions were within 10% and 15%, respectively, with only a few exceptions. The exhaust flow rate measurements were within 10% at low speeds (urban conditions), and 5% at higher speeds. These results confirm the legislated permitted tolerances and the 2017 PEMS uncertainty estimates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据