4.7 Article

Efficient methylammonium lead iodide perovskite solar cells with active layers from 300 to 900 nm

期刊

APL MATERIALS
卷 2, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.4890056

关键词

-

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO) [MAT2011-24594]
  2. Generalitat Valenciana [Prometeo/2012/053]
  3. MINECO [CTQ2010-17481]
  4. Junta de Andalucia (CICyE) [P10-FQM-6703]
  5. MECD (Spanish Ministry of Education, Culture, and Sport)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Efficient methylammonium lead iodide perovskite-based solar cells have been prepared in which the perovskite layer is sandwiched in between two organic charge transporting layers that block holes and electrons, respectively. This configuration leads to stable and reproducible devices that do not suffer from strong hysteresis effects and when optimized lead to efficiencies close to 15%. The perovskite layer is formed by using a dual-source thermal evaporation method, whereas the organic layers are processed from solution. The dual-source thermal evaporation method leads to smooth films and allows for high precision thickness variations. Devices were prepared with perovskite layer thicknesses ranging from 160 to 900 nm. The short-circuit current observed for these devices increased with increasing perovskite layer thickness. The main parameter that decreases with increasing perovskite layer thickness is the fill factor and as a result optimum device performance is obtained for perovskite layer thickness around 300 nm. However, here we demonstrate that with a slightly oxidized electron blocking layer the fill factor for the solar cells with a perovskite layer thickness of 900 nm increases to the same values as for the devices with thin perovskite layers. As a result the power conversion efficiencies for the cells with 300 and 900 nm are very similar, 12.7% and 12%, respectively. (C) 2014 Author(s). All article content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据