4.4 Article

Thermal degradation of Miscanthus pellets: kinetics and aerosols characterization

期刊

WASTE AND BIOMASS VALORIZATION
卷 2, 期 2, 页码 149-155

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12649-010-9060-4

关键词

Energy crops; Miscanthus; Pellets; Thermal degradation; Kinetics; Aerosols

资金

  1. Alsace Regional Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Interest in the cultivation of plants specifically for energetic use has grown tremendously in recent years. Among the numerous tested energetic plants, Miscanthus seems to be an especially, promising 'energy crop'. The presented data may have a contribution in developing Miscanthus pellets as a feedstock for energy recovery systems. Combustion and pyrolysis are efficient methods for controlling energy efficiency from Miscanthus. Thermogravimetric analyses were performed at heating rates of 5, 10, 15, and 20 degrees C min(-1) under nitrogen and air atmospheres with analysis of gaseous (CO, CO2 and VOC) pollutants and aerosols. Reactivity and kinetics measurements of Miscanthus pellets were also performed. Thermal degradation of Miscanthus pellets under inert atmosphere is similar to those found for other lignocellulosic materials. Under nitrogen, the main study was the determination of kinetic constants. These constants for main devolatilization step are not affected by variation of the heating rate with activation energy of 90 kJ mol(-1) and a first reaction order. Thermal degradation of Miscanthus pellets under air occurs in main two steps: rapid decomposition and residual degradation. The amounts of CO2, CO and VOC emitted were 17.4, 3.7 and 1.0 mmol g(-1), respectively. Pellets degradation produces 1.0 x 10(12) particles (PM10) per gram of sample. 99% are particles with a diameter below 1 mu m (57% are nanoparticles inferior to 0.1 mu m). Nucleation mode dominates during the first step (190-253 degrees C) centred at 0.04 mu m whereas during the second step (253-310 degrees C) a coagulation mode is observed centred at 0.5 mu m.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据