4.5 Article

Water Adsorption on the β-Dicalcium Silicate Surface from DFT Simulations

期刊

MINERALS
卷 8, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/min8090386

关键词

belite; hydration; density functional theory; water adsorption; calcium silicate

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51602148]
  2. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)
  3. Program for Innovative Research Team in the University of Ministry of Education of China [IRT_15R35]
  4. Departamento de Educacion, Politica Linguistica y Cultura del Gobierno Vasco [IT912-16]
  5. ELKARTEK project

向作者/读者索取更多资源

beta-dicalcium silicate (beta-Ca2SiO4 or beta-C2S in cement chemistry notation) is one of the most important minerals in cement. An improvement of its hydration rate would be the key point for developing environmentally-friendly cements with lower energy consumption and CO2 emissions. However, there is a lack of fundamental understanding on the water/beta-C2S surface interactions. In this work, we aim to evaluate the water adsorption on three beta-C2S surfaces at the atomic scale using density functional theory (DFT) calculations. Our results indicate that thermodynamically favorable water adsorption takes place in several surface sites with a broad range of adsorption energies (-0.78 to -1.48 eV) depending on the particular mineral surface and adsorption site. To clarify the key factor governing the adsorption of the electronic properties of water at the surface were analyzed. The partial density of states (DOS), charge analysis, and electron density difference analyses suggest a dual interaction of water with a beta-C2S (100) surface including a nucleophilic interaction of the water oxygen lone pair with surface calcium atoms and an electrophilic interaction (hydrogen bond) of one water hydrogen with surface oxygen atoms. Despite the elucidation of the adsorption mechanism, no correlation was found between the electronic structure and the adsorption energies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据