4.6 Review

The role of macrolides in asthma: current evidence and future directions

期刊

LANCET RESPIRATORY MEDICINE
卷 2, 期 8, 页码 657-670

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S2213-2600(14)70107-9

关键词

-

资金

  1. ERC [233015]
  2. Clinical Chair from Asthma UK [CH11SJ]
  3. MRC Centre [G1000758]
  4. Predicta FP7 Collaborative Project [260895]
  5. Wellcome Trust sponsored Centre for Respiratory Infection
  6. Asthma UK [RF07/04]
  7. BBSRC CASE studentship in association with Pfizer
  8. Asthma UK [RF07/04, MRC-AsthmaUKCentre, MRC-Asthma UK Centre] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. Medical Research Council [G1000758B, G1000758] Funding Source: researchfish
  10. MRC [G0601236, G0600879] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Macrolides, such as darithromycin and azithromycin, possess antimicrobial, immunomodulatory, and potential antiviral properties. They represent a potential therapeutic option for asthma, a chronic inflammatory disorder characterised by airway hyper-responsiveness that leads to recurrent episodes of wheezing, breathlessness, chest tightness, and coughing. Results from clinical trials, however, have been contentious. The findings could be confounded by many factors, induding the heterogeneity of asthma, treatment duration, dose, and differing outcome measures. Recent evidence suggests improved effectiveness of macrolides in patients with sub-optimally controlled severe neutrophilic asthma and in asthma exacerbations. We examine the evidence from dinical trials and discuss macrolide properties and their relevance to the pathophysiology of asthma. At present, the use of macrolides in chronic asthma or acute exacerbations is not justified. Further work, including proteomic, genomic, and microbiome studies, will advance our knowledge of asthma phenotypes, and help to identify a macrolide-responsive subgroup. Future dinical trials should target this subgroup and place emphasis on clinically relevant outcomes such as asthma exacerbations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据