4.1 Article

Magnetic Bionanoparticle Enhances Homing of Endothelial Progenitor Cells in Mouse Hindlimb Ischemia

期刊

KOREAN CIRCULATION JOURNAL
卷 42, 期 6, 页码 390-396

出版社

KOREAN SOC CARDIOLOGY
DOI: 10.4070/kcj.2012.42.6.390

关键词

Nanoparticles; Stem cells; Ischemia

资金

  1. Korean Society of Cardiology
  2. Innovative Research Institute for Cell Therapy, University Hospital - Ministry of Health, Welfare & Family, Republic of Korea [A062260]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and Objectives: Poor homing efficiency is one of the major limitations of current stem cell therapy. Magnetic bionanoparticles (MPs) obtained from Magnetospirillum sp. AMB-1 have a lipid bilayer membrane and ferromagnetic properties. We evaluated a novel priming strategy using MPs to enhance the homing of transplanted progenitor cells to target tissue. Materials and Methods: Effects of MP on proliferation, viability, and migration of late human endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) were examined in vitro. Additionally, effects of MP on gene and protein expression related to survival and adhesion were evaluated. Homing and angiogenic efficiency of MP transferred late EPCs was evaluated in nude mouse hindlimb ischemia model. Results: Below threshold concentration, MP transfer did not influence proliferation or survival of late EPCs, but enhanced migration and trans-endothelial migration of late EPCs toward magnet. Below threshold concentration, MP transfer did not influence gene and protein expression related to survival. In the mouse hindlimb ischemia model, late EPCs treated with high dose MP (5 ug/mL) showed enhanced homing of injected late EPCs in the ischemic limb by magnet, compared to low dose MP (1 ug/mL) treated late EPCs. In addition, high dose MP transferred EPC showed significantly better improvement of perfusion in ischemic limb compared to untreated EPC. Conclusion: MP transfer with magnet application can be a promising novel strategy to enhance homing efficacy and outcomes of current stem cell therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据