4.4 Article

MRI Mapping of Cerebrovascular Reactivity via Gas Inhalation Challenges

期刊

出版社

JOURNAL OF VISUALIZED EXPERIMENTS
DOI: 10.3791/52306

关键词

Medicine; Issue 94; Cerebrovascular reactivity; cerebrovascular diseases; MRI-compatible gas delivery systems; hypercapnia; hyperoxia; CO2; O-2

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [R01 MH084021, R01 NS067015, R01 AG042753, NS076588, NS029029-20S1, R21 NS078656]
  2. National Multiple Sclerosis Society [RG4707A2]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The brain is a spatially heterogeneous and temporally dynamic organ, with different regions requiring different amount of blood supply at different time. Therefore, the ability of the blood vessels to dilate or constrict, known as Cerebral-Vascular-Reactivity (CVR), represents an important domain of vascular function. An imaging marker representing this dynamic property will provide new information of cerebral vessels under normal and diseased conditions such as stroke, dementia, atherosclerosis, small vessel diseases, brain tumor, traumatic brain injury, and multiple sclerosis. In order to perform this type of measurement in humans, it is necessary to deliver a vasoactive stimulus such as CO2 and/or O-2 gas mixture while quantitative brain magnetic resonance images (MRI) are being collected. In this work, we presented a MR compatible gas-delivery system and the associated protocol that allow the delivery of special gas mixtures (e.g., O-2, CO2, N-2, and their combinations) while the subject is lying inside the MRI scanner. This system is relatively simple, economical, and easy to use, and the experimental protocol allows accurate mapping of CVR in both healthy volunteers and patients with neurological disorders. This approach has the potential to be used in broad clinical applications and in better understanding of brain vascular pathophysiology. In the video, we demonstrate how to set up the system inside an MRI suite and how to perform a complete experiment on a human participant.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据