4.4 Article

Increased levels of galectin-3 were associated with prediabetes and diabetes: new risk factor?

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION
卷 38, 期 5, 页码 527-533

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s40618-014-0222-2

关键词

Galectin-3; Prediabetes; Diabetes; Insulin resistance; Inflammation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose Galectin-3 (Gal-3) is a marker of cardiac fibrosis and predicts incident heart failure. Gal-3-deficient mice are resistant to multiple low-dose streptozotocin-induced diabetes. Recent experimental studies suggested an important role for Gal-3 in the regulation of adiposity, metaflammation and type 2 diabetes. This study aimed to examine the relationship between Gal-3 and newly diagnosed prediabetes and diabetes. Methods Gal-3 concentrations were measured in 118 participants and 56 age-and sex-matched healthy controls. All subjects underwent a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test and were stratified into normal, prediabetic, and diabetes mellitus subgroups. DM was defined as a plasma glucose level >= 126 mg/dL in the fasting state or >= 200 mg/dL in the second hour after glucose loading. Impaired fasting glucose was defined as an FPG level of 100-125 mg/dL, and impaired glucose tolerance was defined as a 2-h plasma glucose level of 140-199 mg/dL. Results Sixty-one patients had prediabetes (Group 1), 57 had diabetes (Group 2), and 56 had neither diabetes nor prediabetes (Group 3). Gal-3 levels correlated with FPG (r = 0.787, P < 0.01), 2hPG (r = 0.833, P < 0.01), CRP (r = 0.501, P < 0.01), and HOMA-IR (r = 0.518, P < 0.01). Gal-3 levels were higher in Group 2 than in Groups 1 and 3 [1,053.9 (358.1) and 744.1 (119.3) vs. 481.7 (175.4) pg/mL; P < 0.001]. Gal-3 is an independent predictor of diabetes in multivariate logistic analysis. In ROC analysis, a Gal-3 cutoff value of 803.55 pg/mL diagnoses diabetes with a sensitivity of 80.7 % and a specificity of 85.5 % (AUC = 0.912). Conclusions Gal-3 is a promising biomarker for detecting prediabetes and diabetes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据