4.3 Article

Optimal strategy for controlling the spread of HIV/AIDS disease: a case study of South Africa

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL DYNAMICS
卷 6, 期 2, 页码 475-494

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17513758.2011.628700

关键词

antiretroviral treatment; basic reproduction number; disease incidence; disease prevalence; optimal control; Pontryagin's maximum principle; optimality system

资金

  1. National Science Foundation African Biomathematics initiative [6RT00014792]
  2. German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

HIV/AIDS disease continues to spread alarmingly despite the huge amounts of resources invested in fighting it. There is a need to integrate the series of control measures available to ensure a consistent reduction in the incidence of the disease pending the discovery of its cure. We present a deterministic model for controlling the spread of the disease using change in sexual habits and antiretroviral (ARV) therapy as control measures. We formulate a fixed time optimal control problem subject to the model dynamics with the goal of finding the optimal combination of the two control measures that will minimize the cost of the control efforts as well as the incidence of the disease. We estimate the model state initial conditions and parameter values from the demographic and HIV/AIDS data of South Africa. We use Pontryagin's maximum principle to derive the optimality system and solve the system numerically. Compared with the practice in most resource-limited settings where ARV treatment is given only to patients with full-blown AIDS, our simulation results suggest that starting the treatment as soon as the patients progress to the pre-AIDS stage of the disease coupled with appreciable change in the susceptible individuals' sexual habits reduces both the incidence and prevalence of the disease faster. In fact, the results predict that the implementation of the proposed strategy would drive new cases of the disease towards eradication in 10 years.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据