4.7 Article

The impact of genomic relatedness between populations on the genomic estimated breeding values

期刊

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s40104-018-0279-4

关键词

Genomic prediction; Genomic relationship; Joint population prediction

资金

  1. earmarked fund for China Agriculture Research System [CARS-36]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31671327, 31701077, 31371258]
  3. Program for Changjiang Scholar and Innovation Research Team in University [IRT1191]
  4. Anhui Science and Technology Key Project [17030701008]
  5. Anhui Academy of Agricultural Sciences Key Laboratory Project [18S0404]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In genomic selection, prediction accuracy is highly driven by the size of animals in the reference population (RP). Combining related populations from different countries and regions or using a related population with large size of RP has been considered to be viable strategies in cattle breeding. The genetic relationship between related populations is important for improving the genomic predictive ability. In this study, we used 122 French bulls as test individuals. The genomic estimated breeding values (GEBVs) evaluated using French RP, America RP and Chinese RP were compared. The results showed that the GEBVs were in higher concordance using French RP and American RP compared with using Chinese population. The persistence analysis, kinship analysis and the principal component analysis (PCA) were performed for 270 French bulls, 270 American bulls and 270 Chinese bulls to interpret the results. All the analyses illustrated that the genetic relationship between French bulls and American bulls was closer compared with Chinese bulls. Another reason could be the size of RP in China was smaller than the other two RPs. In conclusion, using RP of a related population to predict GEBVs of the animals in a target population is feasible when these two populations have a close genetic relationship and the related population is large.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据