4.6 Article

Inflammation induced by mast cell deficiency rather than the loss of interstitial cells of Cajal causes smooth muscle dysfunction in W/Wv mice

期刊

FRONTIERS IN PHYSIOLOGY
卷 5, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2014.00022

关键词

enteric nervous system; motility disorders; ICC; nNOS; enteric neurotransmission; nitric oxide; diabetes; slow transit constipation

资金

  1. NIDDK Grant [5R01DK032346]
  2. John Sealy Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The initial hypothesis suggested that the interstitial cells of Cajal (ICC) played an essential role in mediating enteric neuronal input to smooth muscle cells. Much information for this hypothesis came from studies in W/W-v mice lacking ICC. However, mast cells, which play critical roles in regulating inflammation in their micro environment, are also absent in W/W-v mice. We tested the hypothesis that the depletion of mast cells in W/W-v mice generates inflammation in fundus muscularis externa (ME) that impairs smooth muscle reactivity to Ach, independent of the depletion of ICC. We performed experiments on the fundus ME from wild type (WT) and W/W-v mice before and after reconstitution of mast cells by bone marrow transplant. We found that mast cell deficiency in W/W-v mice significantly increased COX-2 and iNOS expression and decreased smooth muscle reactivity to Ach. Mast cell reconstitution or concurrent blockade of COX-2 and iNOS restored smooth muscle contractility without affecting the suppression of c-kit in W/W-v mice. The expression of nNOS and ChAT were suppressed in W/W-v mice; mast cell reconstitution did not restore them. We conclude that innate inflammation induced by mast cell deficiency in W/W-v mice impairs smooth muscle contractility independent of ICC deficiency. The impairment of smooth muscle contractility and the suppression of the enzymes regulating the synthesis of Ach and NO in W/W-v mice need to be considered in evaluating the role of ICC in regulating smooth muscle and enteric neuronal function in W/W-v mice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据