4.6 Review

Targeting cardiac β-adrenergic signaling via GRK2 inhibition for heart failure therapy

期刊

FRONTIERS IN PHYSIOLOGY
卷 4, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2013.00264

关键词

heart failure; beta adrenergic system; beta blockers; G-protein coupled receptors; G-protein-coupled receptor kinase 2

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cardiac cells, like those of the other tissues, undergo regulation through membrane-bound proteins known as G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). beta-adrenergic receptors (beta ARs) are key GPCRs expressed on cardiomyocytes and their role is crucial in cardiac physiology since they regulate inotropic and chronotropic responses of the sympathetic nervous system (SNS). In compromised conditions such as heart failure (HF), chronic beta AR hyperstimulation occurs via SNS activation resulting in receptor dysregulation and down-regulation and consequently there is a marked reduction of myocardial inotropic reserve and continued loss of pump function. Data accumulated over the last two decades indicates that a primary culprit in initiating and maintain beta AR dysfunction in the injured and stressed heart is GPCR kinase 2 (GRK2), which was originally known as beta ARK1 (for beta AR kinase). GRK2 is up-regulated in the failing heart due to chronic SNS activity and targeting this kinase has emerged as a novel therapeutic strategy in HF. Indeed, its inhibition or genetic deletion in several disparate animal models of HF including a pre-clinical pig model has shown that GRK2 targeting improves functional and morphological parameters of the failing heart. Moreover, non-beta AR properties of GRK2 appear to also contribute to its pathological effects and thus, its inhibition will likely complement existing therapies such as beta AR blockade. This review will explore recent research regarding GRK2 inhibition; in particular it will focus on the GRK2 inhibitor peptide known as beta ARKct, which represents new hope in the treatment against HF progression.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据