4.7 Review

Subcellular Targeting of Theranostic Radionuclides

期刊

FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2018.00996

关键词

subcellular targeting; radioimmunotherapy; targeted radionuclide therapy; radiopharmaceuticals; cancer; dosimetry

资金

  1. Cancer Research UK (CRUK) [C5255/A15935]
  2. Medical Research Council (MRC) [MC_PC_12004]
  3. EPSRC Oxford Centre for Drug Delivery Devices [EP/L024012/1]
  4. CRUK Oxford Centre
  5. EPSRC [EP/L024012/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The last decade has seen rapid growth in the use of theranostic radionuclides for the treatment and imaging of a wide range of cancers. Radionuclide therapy and imaging rely on a radiolabeled vector to specifically target cancer cells. Radionuclides that emit beta particles have thus far dominated the field of targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT), mainly because the longer range (mu m m-mm track length) of these particles offsets the heterogeneous expression of the molecular target. Shorter range (mu m-mm track length) alpha- and Auger electron (AE)-emitting radionuclides on the other hand provide high ionization densities at the site of decay which could overcome much of the toxicity associated with beta-emitters. Given that there is a growing body of evidence that other sensitive sites besides the DNA, such as the cell membrane and mitochondria, could be critical targets in TRT, improved techniques in detecting the subcellular distribution of these radionuclides are necessary, especially since many beta-emitting radionuclides also emit AE. The successful development of TRT agents capable of homing to targets with subcellular precision demands the parallel development of quantitative assays for evaluation of spatial distribution of radionuclides in the nm-mu m range. In this review, the status of research directed at subcellular targeting of radionuclide theranostics and the methods for imaging and quantification of radionuclide localization at the nanoscale are described.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据