4.7 Review

Calcium signaling and gliotransmission in normal vs. reactive astrocytes

期刊

FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY
卷 3, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2012.00139

关键词

glia; IP3R; microglia; neurological disorder; neurodegenerative disease,TNF alpha; G(q) GPCR; inflammation

资金

  1. Paris School of Neuroscience (Ecole des Neurosciences de Paris)
  2. Epilepsy Foundation grant
  3. Hellman Foundation fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A prominent area of neuroscience research over the past 20 years has been the acute modulation of neuronal synaptic activity by Ca2+-dependent release of the transmitters ATP D-serine, and glutamate (called gliotransmitters) by astrocytes. Although the physiological relevance of this mechanism is under debate, emerging evidence suggests that there are critical factors in addition to Ca2+ that are required for gliotransmitters to be released from astrocytes. Interestingly, these factors include activated microglia and the proinflammatory cytokineTumor Necrosis Factor alpha (TNF alpha), chemotactic cytokine Stromal cell-Derived Factor-1 alpha (SDF-1 alpha), and inflammatory mediator prostaglandin E2 (PGE(2)). Of note, microglial activation and release of inflammatory molecules from activated microglia and reactive astrocytes can occur within minutes of a triggering stimulus. Therefore, activation of astrocytes by inflammatory molecules combined with Ca2+ elevations may lead to gliotransmitter release, and be an important step in the early sequence of events contributing to hyperexcitability, excitotoxicity, and neurodegeneration in the damaged or diseased brain. In this review, we will first examine evidence questioning Ca2+-dependent gliotransmitter release from astrocytes in healthy brain tissue, followed by a close examination of recent work suggesting that Ca2+-dependent gliotransmitter release occurs as an early event in the development of neurological disorders and neuroinflammatory and neurodegenerative diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据