4.6 Article

MRI Asymmetry Index of Hippocampal Subfields Increases Through the Continuum From the Mild Cognitive Impairment to the Alzheimer's Disease

期刊

FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE
卷 12, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00576

关键词

hippocampus; hippocampal subfields; asymmetry index; Alzheimer's disease; Mild Cognitive Impairment; neuroimaging

资金

  1. Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) (National Institutes of Health) [U01 AG024904]
  2. DOD ADNI (Department of Defense) [W81XWH-12-2-0012]
  3. National Institute on Aging
  4. National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering
  5. AbbVie
  6. Alzheimer's Association
  7. Alzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation
  8. Araclon Biotech
  9. BioClinica, Inc.
  10. Biogen
  11. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
  12. CereSpir, Inc.
  13. Cogstate
  14. Eisai Inc.
  15. Elan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  16. Eli Lilly and Company
  17. EuroImmun
  18. F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd
  19. Genentech, Inc
  20. Fujirebio
  21. GE Healthcare
  22. IXICO Ltd.
  23. Janssen Alzheimer Immunotherapy Research & Development, LLC.
  24. Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development LLC.
  25. Lumosity
  26. Lundbeck
  27. Merck Co., Inc.
  28. Meso Scale Diagnostics, LLC.
  29. NeuroRx Research
  30. Neurotrack Technologies
  31. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
  32. Pfizer Inc.
  33. Piramal Imaging
  34. Servier
  35. Takeda Pharmaceutical Company
  36. Transition Therapeutics
  37. Canadian Institutes of Health Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: It is well-known that the hippocampus presents significant asymmetry in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and that difference in volumes between left and right exists and varies with disease progression. However, few works investigated whether the asymmetry degree of subfields of hippocampus changes through the continuum from Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) to AD. Thus, aim of the present work was to evaluate the Asymmetry Index (AI) of hippocampal substructures as possible MRI biomarkers of Dementia. Moreover, we aimed to assess whether the subfields presented peculiar differences between left and right hemispheres. We also investigated the relationship between the asymmetry magnitude in hippocampal subfields and the decline of verbal memory as assessed by Rey's auditory verbal learning test (RAVLT). Methods: Four-hundred subjects were selected from ADNI, equally divided into healthy controls (HC), AD, stableMCI (sMCI), and progressive MCI (pMCI). The structural baseline T1s were processed with FreeSurfer 6.0 and volumes of whole hippocampus (WH) and 12 subfields were extracted. The Al was calculated as: (|Left-Right|/(Left+Right))*100. ANCOVA was used for evaluating Al differences between diagnoses, while paired t-test was applied for assessing changes between left and right volumes, separately for each group. Partial correlation was performed for exploring relationship between RAVLT summary scores (Immediate, Learning, Forgetting, Percent Forgetting) and hippocampal substructures Al. The statistical threshold was Bonferroni corrected p < 0.05/13 = 0.0038. Results: We found a general trend of increased degree of asymmetry with increasing severity of diagnosis. Indeed, AD presented the higher magnitude of asymmetry compared with HC, sMCI and pMCI, in the WH (AI mean 5.13 +/- 4.29 SD) and in each of its twelve subfields. Moreover, we found in AD a significant negative correlation (r = -0.33, p = 0.00065) between the Al of parasubiculum (mean 12.70 +/- 9.59 SD) and the RAVLT Learning score (mean 1.70 +/- 1.62 SD). Conclusions: Our findings showed that hippocampal subfields AI varies differently among the four groups HC, sMCl, pMCl, and AD. Moreover, we found-for the first time-that hippocampal substructures had different sub-patterns of lateralization compared with the whole hippocampus. Importantly, the severity in learning rate was correlated with pathological high degree of asymmetry in parasubiculum of AD patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据