4.3 Article

The DNA intercalators ethidium bromide and propidium iodide also bind to core histones

期刊

FEBS OPEN BIO
卷 4, 期 -, 页码 251-259

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1016/j.fob.2014.02.006

关键词

Chromatin compaction; Histone and DNA binding; DNA release; Histone acetylation

资金

  1. Molecular Mechanism of Disease and Drug Action (MMDDA) [11-RD-SIN-5.04]
  2. Biomolecular Assembly, Recognition and Dynamics (BARD) project from the Department of Atomic Energy (DAE), Government of India
  3. Ramalingaswami Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Eukaryotic DNA is compacted in the form of chromatin, in a complex with histones and other nonhistone proteins. The intimate association of DNA and histones in chromatin raises the possibility that DNA-interactive small molecules may bind to chromatin-associated proteins such as histones. Employing biophysical and biochemical techniques we have characterized the interaction of a classical intercalator, ethidium bromide (EB) and its structural analogue propidium iodide (PI) with hierarchical genomic components: long chromatin, chromatosome, core octamer and chromosomal DNA. Our studies show that EB and PI affect both chromatin structure and function, inducing chromatin compaction and disruption of the integrity of the chromatosome. Calorimetric studies and fluorescence measurements of the ligands demonstrated and characterized the association of these ligands with core histones and the intact octamer in absence of DNA. The ligands affect acetylation of histone H3 at lysine 9 and acetylation of histone H4 at lysine 5 and lysine 8 ex vivo. PI alters the post-translational modifications to a greater extent than EB. This is the first report showing the dual binding (chromosomal DNA and core histones) property of a classical intercalator, EB, and its longer analogue, PI, in the context of chromatin. (C) 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of the Federation of European Biochemical Societies. This is an open access article under the CC BY license.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据