4.3 Article

What is a mechanism? Thinking about mechanisms across the sciences

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s13194-011-0038-2

关键词

Mechanism; Explanation; MDC; Glennan; Bechtel; Astrophysical mechanism

资金

  1. Leverhulme Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

After a decade of intense debate about mechanisms, there is still no consensus characterization. In this paper we argue for a characterization that applies widely to mechanisms across the sciences. We examine and defend our disagreements with the major current contenders for characterizations of mechanisms. Ultimately, we indicate that the major contenders can all sign up to our characterization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据