4.3 Article

Characterization of subepithelial lesions of the stomach and esophagus by contrast-enhanced EUS: A retrospective study

期刊

ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND
卷 8, 期 1, 页码 43-49

出版社

WOLTERS KLUWER MEDKNOW PUBLICATIONS
DOI: 10.4103/eus.eus_89_17

关键词

Contrast enhancement; diagnosis; endosonography; esophagus; subepithelial lesions of the stomach

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and Objective: Subepithelial lesions (SELs) of the upper part of the digestive tract are rare, and it can be difficult to characterize them. Recently, contrast-enhanced endosonography (EUS) and elastometry have been reported as useful adjuncts to EUS and EUS-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in cases of pancreatic mass and lymph node involvment. The aim of this retrospective analysis was to evaluate Whether contrast-enhanced EUS can discriminate benign submucosal lesions from malignant ones. We describe our retrospective experience using the contrast agent SonoVue (R) (Bracco Imaging, Milan, Italy) in an attempt to increase the diagnostic yield. Patients and Methods: Between May 2011 and September 2014, 14 patients (5 men, 9 women; median age 64 years, range 31-80 years) with SELs of the stomach or esophagus underwent EUS with SonoVue (low mechanical index). There were 3 esophageal lesions and 11 gastric lesions. Mean size of the lesions was 30 mm (range 11-50 min). They were discovered after anemia (n = 5). dy sphagia (n = 1). and pain (n = 4) and during follow-up for resected gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) (n = 1) and a standard upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (n= 3). On endoscopic sonograms, 10 of these lesions were hypoechoic and located in the fourth layer (muscularis), and 4 were in the second or third layer (mucosa and submucosa). Contrast enhancement was assessed in the early phase (after several seconds) and late phase (>30 seconds); a final diagnosis was made based on the findings of EUS-FNA using a 19-gauge ProCore (Cook Medical, Bloomington, IN) (n = 9) or 22-gauge FNA system (Cook Medical) (n = 1), the resected specimen (n = 3), or deep biopsy (n= 1). Different immunostaining was used in the pathologic studies (RNA was analyzed later using the C-kit, CD-117, CD-34, desmin, DOG-1, alpha-smooth actin, caldesmon, PS-100, and Ki-67 antibodies). Results: Final diagnoses were leiomyoma (n = 4), GIST (n = 5), schwannoma (n = 1), inflammatoty tumor of Helvig (n = 1), pancreas rest (n = 2), and fibrosis (n= 1). No complications occurred. All 5 GISTs showed enhancement in the early and late phases, whereas the 8 remaining lesions did not show any enhancement. Only 1 leiomyoma showed heterogeneous enhancement. Limitation: The monocentric and retrospective study design and small number of patients. Conclusions: In cases of SELs of the stomach or esophagus. SonoVue (R) could be a complementary tool to endosonography to differentiate GISTs (early and clear enhancement) from other SELs (few or no enhancement), such as leiomyomas or pancreatic rest. These results am similar to those of the few. small studies published on this topic, but more studies with a larger number of patients are needed to confirm these findings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据