4.3 Article

Antisite defect elimination through Mg doping in stoichiometric lithium tantalate powder synthesized via a wet-chemical spray-drying method

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED CRYSTALLOGRAPHY
卷 48, 期 -, 页码 377-385

出版社

INT UNION CRYSTALLOGRAPHY
DOI: 10.1107/S1600576715002113

关键词

antisite defect elimination; stoichiometric lithium tantalate; magnesium doping; wet-chemical spray drying

资金

  1. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program) [2013AA030501]
  2. NSFC [NSFDYS: 51402172, IRG: 51321091]
  3. Program of Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities in China (111 Program) [b06015]
  4. China Scholarship Council (CSC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

MgO-doped stoichiometric LiTaO3 (MgO:SLT) is one of the most promising nonlinear materials. However, its industrial application is limited by the poor optical quality caused by the nonhomogeneous distribution of magnesium. Herein, an MgO:SLT polycrystalline powder was synthesized with a homogenous magnesium distribution by a wet-chemical spray-drying method. A comparative investigation of the coordination state of Ta ions in MgO:SLT powders synthesized by this method and by a conventional solid-state reaction method was performed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. It is proved that the Ta-Li antisite was completely eliminated as a result of the homogeneous Mg doping in the SLT lattice using the wet-chemical spray-drying method. However, for MgO:LT powder produced by the solid-state reaction method, element analysis after acid treatment shows that some Mg ions did not enter the LT lattice after high-temperature calcination. Also, scanning electron microscopy and transmission electron microscopy energy dispersive spectroscopy verified that some MgO particles still exist in the as-synthesized MgO:LT powder. This synthesis method can be used for mass production of high-quality polycrystalline powders for doped crystal growth and some other doped oxide powder products with high melt point.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据