4.1 Article

Effects of balance training using a virtual-reality system in older fallers

期刊

CLINICAL INTERVENTIONS IN AGING
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 257-263

出版社

DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.2147/CIA.S41453

关键词

falls; balance; postural instability; virtual reality; elderly

资金

  1. Nepean Medical Research Foundation
  2. Department of Geriatric Medicine at Nepean Hospital
  3. Rebecca Cooper Medical Research Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Poor balance is considered a challenging risk factor for falls in older adults. Therefore,innovative interventions for balance improvement in this population are greatly needed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a new virtual-reality system (the Balance Rehabilitation Unit [BRU]) on balance, falls, and fear of falling in a population of community-dwelling older subjects with a known history of falls. In this study, 60 community-dwelling older subjects were recruited after being diagnosed with poor balance at the Falls and Fractures Clinic, Nepean Hospital (Penrith, NSW, Australia). Subjects were randomly assigned to either the BRU-training or control groups. Both groups received the usual falls prevention care. The BRU-training group attended balance training (two sessions/week for 6 weeks) using an established protocol. Change in balance parameters was assessed in the BRU-training group at the end of their 6-week training program. Both groups were assessed 9 months after their initial assessment (month 0). Adherence to the BRU-training program was 97%. Balance parameters were significantly improved in the BRU-training group (P < 0.01). This effect was also associated with a significant reduction in falls and lower levels of fear of falling (P < 0.01). Some components of balance that were improved by BRU training showed a decline after 9 months post-training. In conclusion, BRU training is an effective and well-accepted intervention to improve balance, increase confidence, and prevent falls in the elderly.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据