4.5 Article

Climbing the Activity Volcano: Core-Shell Ru@Pt Electrocatalysts for Oxygen Reduction

期刊

CHEMELECTROCHEM
卷 1, 期 1, 页码 67-71

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/celc.201300117

关键词

core-shell catalysts; density functional calculations; fuel cells; rational catalyst design; reaction kinetics

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Basic Energy Sciences [DE-SC0008685]
  2. National Science Foundation [1066515]
  3. Department of Defense (DoD) through the National Defense Science & Engineering Graduate Fellowship (NDSEG) Program
  4. U.S. Department of Energy, Basic Energy Sciences, through the SUNCAT Center for Interface Science and Catalysis
  5. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys
  6. Directorate For Engineering [1066515] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  7. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0008685] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We outline a systematic approach to develop active catalyst materials for an electrochemical reaction. The strategy allows one to tune binding energies of oxygen reaction intermediates on a catalyst surface by taking advantage of two effects: weakening oxygen binding energies by means of thin-film overlayers, and strengthening oxygen binding energies through nano-scale effects. By engineering a core-shell nanoparticle morphology with the appropriate dimensions, that is, the thickness of the overlayer and the size of the nanoparticle, bonding properties can be modified to improve the catalytic activity of the core-shell system. We demonstrate the application of this strategy for oxygen reduction by identifying Ru@Pt as a candidate material using density functional theory calculations, and then use these calculations to guide the synthesis of active Ru@Pt core-shell catalysts. The Ru@Pt particles, synthesized using a wet chemical method, exhibit similar to 2 times higher specific activity (based on electrochemical active surface area) than state-of-the-art Pt/C from TKK.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据