4.6 Article

PD-L1 Expression in Melanocytic Lesions Does Not Correlate with the BRAF V600E Mutation

期刊

CANCER IMMUNOLOGY RESEARCH
卷 3, 期 2, 页码 110-115

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-14-0145

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [R01 CA142779]
  2. Melanoma Research Alliance
  3. Barney Family Foundation
  4. Laverna Hahn Charitable Trust
  5. Dermatology Foundation
  6. Commonwealth Foundation
  7. Moving for Melanoma of Delaware
  8. Stand Up To Cancer-Cancer Research Institute Cancer Immunology Dream Team Translational Research Grant [SU2C-AACR-DT1012]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PD-L1 expression in melanoma correlates with response to PD-1 pathway-blocking antibodies. Aberrant tumor-cell PD-L1 expression may be oncogene driven and/or induced by IFN gamma. Melanomas express PD-L1 in association with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL), but the potential contribution of the BRAF V600E mutation (BRAFmut) to induced PD-L1 expression has not been determined. Fifty-two archival melanocytic lesions were assessed for PD-L1 expression, TIL infiltration, and BRAFmut simultaneously. IFN gamma-induced PD-L1 expression in cultured melanomas was assessed in parallel according to BRAF status. Melanocyte PD-L1 expression was observed in 40% of specimens, and BRAFmut was observed in 42% of specimens, but no significant concordance was found between these variables. Almost all melanocytes displaying PD-L1 expression were observed to be adjacent to TILs, irrespective of BRAF status. TIL+ lesions were not more likely to be associated with BRAFmut, when compared with TIL+ lesions. Baseline expression of PD-L1 by melanoma cell lines was virtually nil, regardless of BRAFmut status, and the intensity of IFN-induced PD-L1 expression in melanoma cell lines likewise did not correlate with BRAF mutational status. PD-L1 expression in melanocytic lesions does not correlate with the BRAFmut. Thus, distinct populations of melanoma patients will likely benefit from BRAF inhibitors versus PD-1 pathway blockade. (C) 2014 AACR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据