4.6 Article

T Cells Bearing a Chimeric Antigen Receptor against Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Mediate Vascular Disruption and Result in Tumor Regression

期刊

CANCER IMMUNOLOGY RESEARCH
卷 3, 期 1, 页码 68-84

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-14-0192

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH transformative [R01CA156695]
  2. ERC [1400206AdG-322875]
  3. NCI [R25CA101871, T32CA009140]
  4. NCI SPORE in Ovarian Cancer [P50CA083638-14]
  5. Ovarian Cancer Research Fund
  6. American Cancer Society [IRG-78-002-35]
  7. Sandy Rollman Ovarian Cancer Foundation
  8. Leenaards Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aberrant blood vessels enable tumor growth, provide a barrier to immune infiltration, and serve as a source of protumorigenic signals. Targeting tumor blood vessels for destruction, or tumor vascular disruption therapy, can therefore provide significant therapeutic benefit. Here, we describe the ability of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-bearing T cells to recognize human prostate-specific membrane antigen (hPSMA) on endothelial targets in vitro as well as in vivo. CAR T cells were generated using the anti-PSMA scFv, J591, and the intracellular signaling domains: CD3 xi, CD28, and/or CD137/4-1BB. We found that all anti-hPSMA CAR T cells recognized and eliminated PSMA(+) endothelial targets in vitro, regardless of the signaling domain. T cells bearing the third-generation anti-hPSMA CAR, P28BB xi, were able to recognize and kill primary human endothelial cells isolated from gynecologic cancers. In addition, the P28BB xi CAR T cells mediated regression of hPSMA-expressing vascular neoplasms in mice. Finally, in murine models of ovarian cancers populated by murine vessels expressing hPSMA, the P28BB? CAR T cells were able to ablate PSMA(+) vessels, cause secondary depletion of tumor cells, and reduce tumor burden. Taken together, these results provide a strong rationale for the use of CAR T cells as agents of tumor vascular disruption, specifically those targeting PSMA. (C) 2014 AACR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据