4.3 Article

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal spores host bacteria that affect nutrient biodynamics and biocontrol of soilborne plant pathogens

期刊

BIOLOGY OPEN
卷 1, 期 1, 页码 52-57

出版社

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/bio.2011014

关键词

arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi; bacteria; biocontrol; nutrient biodynamics

类别

资金

  1. Ministry of education, sports and culture of Japan [80405240]
  2. Institute for Fermentation, Osaka, Japan
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [19780022] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this research was to isolate and characterize bacteria from spores of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF). We designated these bacteria 'probable endobacteria' (PE). Three bacterial strains were isolated from approximately 500 spores of Gigaspora margarita (Becker and Hall) using a hypodermic needle (diameter, 200 mm). The bacteria were identified by morphological methods and on the basis of ribosomal gene sequences as Bacillus sp. (KTCIGM01), Bacillus thuringiensis (KTCIGM02), and Paenibacillus rhizospherae (KTCIGM03). We evaluated the effect of these probable endobacteria on antagonistic activity to the soil-borne plant pathogens (SBPPs) Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lactucae MAFF 744088, Rosellinia necatrix, Rhizoctonia solani MAFF 237426, and Pythium ultimum NBRC 100123. We also tested whether these probable endobacteria affected phosphorus solubilization, ethylene production, nitrogenase activity (NA), and stimulation of AMF hyphal growth. In addition, fresh samples of spores and hyphae were photographed using an in situ scanning electron microscope (SEM) (Quanta 250FEG; FEI Co., Japan). Bacterial aggregates (BAs), structures similar to biofilms, could be detected on the surface of hyphae and spores. We demonstrate that using extraction with an ultrathin needle, it is possible to isolate AMF-associated bacterial species that are likely derived from inside the fungal spores. (C) 2011. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据