4.0 Article

SGLT2-INHIBITORS: A NOVEL CLASS FOR THE TREATMENT OF TYPE 2 DIABETES INTRODUCTION OF SGLT2-INHIBITORS IN CLINICAL PRACTICE

期刊

ACTA CLINICA BELGICA
卷 68, 期 4, 页码 287-293

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.2143/ACB.3349

关键词

type 2 diabetes; SGLT2-inhibitors; dapagliflozin; glycosuria

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) continues to present challenges, with significant proportion of patients failing to achieve and maintain glycemic targets. Despite the availability of many oral antidiabetic agents, therapeutic efficacy is offset by side effects such as weight gain and hypoglycemia. Therefore, the search for novel therapeutic agents with an improved benefit-risk profile continues. Recent research has focused on the kidney as a potential therapeutic target, especially because maximal renal glucose reabsorption is increased in T2DM. Under normal physiologicalconditions, nearly all filtered glucose is reabsorbed in the proximal tubule of the nephron, principally via the sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2). SGLT2- inhibitors are a new class of oral antidiabetics, which reduce hyperglycemia by increasing urinary glucose excretion independently of insulin secretion, or action:Clinical results are promising with significant lowering of HbA1c without increased risk of hypoglycemia, reduction of body weight and reduction of systolic blood pressure. Dapagliflozin is the first highly selective SGLT2-inhibitor approved by the European Medecine Agency. Canagliflozin and empagliflozin are undergoing phase III trials. Actual safety issues are an increased risk for genital- and urinary tract infections and a possible increased risk for bladder and breast cancer. This led to refusal of dapagliflozin by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). A large randomized control trial is therefore warranted by the FDA. This review, provides an overview of the Current evidence available so far on the therapeutic potential of the SGLT2-inhibitors for the treatment of T2DM.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据