4.6 Review

Indefinite by Nature: From Ultraviolet to Terahertz

期刊

ACS PHOTONICS
卷 1, 期 4, 页码 293-303

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ph4000983

关键词

indefinite property; hyperbolic materials; graphite; superconductor; ruthenate

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51032003, 11274198]
  2. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China [2012AA030403]
  3. U.S. Army Research Office [W911NF-11-1-0333]
  4. U.S. National Science Foundation [1231852]
  5. Directorate For Engineering
  6. Div Of Electrical, Commun & Cyber Sys [1231852] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A class of strongly anisotropic materials having their principal elements of dielectric permittivity or magnetic permeability tensors of opposite signs, so-called indefinite or hyperbolic materials, has recently attracted significant attention. These materials enabled such novel properties and potential applications as all-angle negative refraction, high density of states, and imaging beyond the diffraction limit using a so-called hyperlens. While several studies identified a few examples of negative refractions in birefringent crystals existing in nature, the majority of optical materials with hyperbolic dispersion relations known to date are engineered composite materials, metamaterials, such as metal-dielectric subwavelength multilayered structures or metal nanowires in a dielectric matrix. In this paper, we investigate naturally existing hyperbolic materials with indefinite permittivity for a range of frequencies from terahertz to ultraviolet. These include graphite, MgB2, cuprate, and ruthenate. Spectroscopic ellipsometry is used to characterize the dielectric properties of graphite and MgB2, and a fitting method based on reflectance spectra is used to determine the indefinite permittivity of the cuprate and ruthenate. Lastly, we discuss the mechanisms behind indefinite properties of these materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据