4.5 Article

Elevated chloride and consumer presence independently influence processing of stream detritus

期刊

URBAN ECOSYSTEMS
卷 15, 期 3, 页码 625-635

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11252-011-0210-7

关键词

-

资金

  1. Division Of Environmental Biology
  2. Direct For Biological Sciences [1027188] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Headwater streams are in close contact with the landscape and known to mediate disturbances to downstream waterways through important ecological interactions. We studied how elevated chloride from road deicer, a pollutant of rising concern in urban ecosystems, influenced the leaf-microbial matrix in streams, and subsequent processing of C and N. In a multi-factorial laboratory experiment, we determined if elevated chloride interacts with nitrogen loading and invertebrate consumer feeding to alter rates of leaf litter breakdown and N immobilization. Naturally colonized leaf litter, the dominant C source in small streams, was collected from five Piedmont streams (Maryland, USA) and subjected to a gradient of NaCl (0, 1,000, 5,000 mg Cl l(-1)) and dissolved nitrogen (ambient, elevated), and an invertebrate treatment (presence, absence) in a total of 60 microcosms. Loss rate and C:N content were determined from remaining leaf litter after 16 d of incubation. Chloride loading significantly (P < 0.05) reduced loss rate regardless of N loading, and C:N content significantly (P < 0.05) increased with Cl concentration, interacting marginally (P < 0.10) with N loading. Invertebrate feeding had a marginally-significant (P < 0.10), negative effect on loss rate, but not C:N content. Overall, elevated chloride significantly influenced organic matter loss rate and N immobilization, despite N loading and the presence of invertebrates. We conclude that there is the potential for chloride loading as road deicer runoff to negatively influence microbial processing of C and N by stream-dwelling microbial communities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据