4.6 Article

Understanding the Living Conditions of Chinese Urban Neighborhoods through Social Infrastructure Configurations: The Case Study of Tianjin

期刊

SUSTAINABILITY
卷 10, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su10093243

关键词

social infrastructure; living condition; neighborhood; urban environment; China

资金

  1. UK ESRC [ES/N010981/1]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41501427]
  3. Major projects of the National Social Science Fund [15ZDB173]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [NKZXB1483]
  5. Project of Asia Research Center in Nankai University [AS1522]
  6. ESRC [ES/N010981/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Under the unprecedented wave of urbanization and pace of economic development, the living conditions of residents have been unevenly changed in Chinese cities. To understand the diversified living conditions in Chinese urban neighborhoods from the supply-side point of view, new spatial and residential data were gathered to investigate the social infrastructure configurations around the residential communities. Using Tianjin as a case study, the research focuses on six important categories of human needs: education, healthcare, leisure, culture, entertainment, and transportation. Based on the cumulative accessibility measurements of 25 types of facilities, the social infrastructure configurations within neighborhoods are statistically and spatially analyzed and compared. The study discovered that: (1) despite the great diversity of living conditions in the city, the neighborhoods that have better services and strong associations with entertainment and education are prominent; (2) the neighborhoods with advantageous living conditions in different aspects tend to cluster at different places; (3) the neighborhoods of different types of communities, belonging to different administrative districts, or in different urban zones, all have distinctive characteristics in living conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据