4.1 Article

Overexpression of cyclooxygenase-2 and transforming growth factor-beta 1 is an independent predictor of poor virological response to interferon therapy in chronic HCV genotype 4 patients

期刊

SAUDI JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 20, 期 1, 页码 59-65

出版社

MEDKNOW PUBLICATIONS & MEDIA PVT LTD
DOI: 10.4103/1319-3767.126324

关键词

Chronic hepatitis; cyclooxygenase-2; hepatitis C virus genotype 4; immunohistochemistry; transforming growth factor-beta1; virological response

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background/Aims: COX-2 and TGF-1 are overexpressed in hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and are related to hepatitis pathogenesis and hepatic fibrosis. The current study investigated the relationship between pretreatment COX-2 and TGF-1 hepatic expression in HCV genotype 4 and the virological response to interferon therapy. Patients and Methods: Liver biopsies of 55 patients with HCV infection genotype 4 were selected together with 10 liver biopsies as control. The patients clinicopathological data were collected. Immunohistochemistry was done using anti-COX-2 and anti-TGF-1 antibodies. Statistical tests were used to determine the association between both COX-2 and TGF-1 expression in relation to clinicopathological parameters and response to interferon therapy. Results: COX-2 was upregulated especially in nonresponders and was an independent predictor of poor virological response. However, COX-2 showed no association with other clinicopathological features. TGF-1 was upregulated and associated with nonresponders, histological activity, and fibrosis stage. There was no association between TGF-1 and other clinicopathological features. There was an association between COX-2 and TGF-1 immunoexpression. Conclusion: Overexpression of COX-2 and TGF-1 is an independent predictor for poor outcome of interferon and ribavirin therapy and these might be useful markers for the response to treatment. Both molecules are associated together; however, their role during hepatitis treatment has to be clarified.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据