4.5 Article

Optimization of phytase production by Penicillium purpurogenum GE1 under solid state fermentation by using Box-Behnken design

期刊

SAUDI JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES
卷 21, 期 1, 页码 81-88

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2013.06.004

关键词

Solid state fermentation; Penicillium purpurogenum; Box-Behnken design; Corn cob; Corn bran

类别

资金

  1. National Research Center, Chemistry of natural and microbial products department (Egypt)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Phytase production by Penicillium purpurogenum GE1 isolated from soil around bean root nodules was investigated by solid state fermentation (SSF) using mixed substrates consisted of corn cob and corn bran. The SSF conditions were optimized by using one-variable-at-a-time strategy. The optimum conditions for phytase production were at 27 degrees C, pH 8 and 66% moisture content. The study of different carbon and nitrogen sources revealed that glucose and peptone registered the highest enzyme productivity (92 +/- 5.6 U/g ds, 125 +/- 4.9 U/g ds). Among different surfactants, maximum phytase productivity was observed with Tween 80 at 0.001 concentrations (170 +/- 4.2 U/g ds). A Box-Behnken design was employed to investigate the optimization of the most significant variables affecting the enzyme production. Maximal phytase production was detected after the addition of (g/5 g ds): 0.75 glucose, 0.375 peptone and 0, 01 tween 80. This result represented an improvement in phytase production of 2.6 folds when compared to that previously obtained using the basal medium under the same cultivation conditions. The generated model was found to be very adequate for phytase production (90% accuracy) as the experimental value was 444 +/- 3.5 U/g ds compared to 401 U/g ds for the predicted value. In brief, the production of phytase using corn cob and corn bran is a novel and cheap way for the production of this important enzyme and opens a new way for researchers to discover and explore this arena. (C) 2014 Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of King Saud University.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据