3.9 Article

The Effect of Head Rotation on Intraocular Pressure in Prone Position: a Randomized Trial

期刊

REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA
卷 63, 期 2, 页码 209-212

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0034-7094(13)70217-4

关键词

Intraocular Pressure; Head Movements; Rotation; Prone position

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and objectives: The increased intraocular pressure (IOP) - which decreases perfusion pressure on the optic nerve - increases by prone positioning (1). The aim of our study was to compare the effect of head rotation 45 degrees laterally in prone position on the increase in IOP of upper placed and lower placed eyes in patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Methods: Forty-five patients were randomly divided into 2 Groups. IOP of the patients were recorded bilaterally in supine position before the operation had started. Patients were turned to prone position. The head was placed on a prone headrest without external direct compression to both eyes. Patients in Group I were kept in strictly neutral prone position where as patients in Group II were placed prone with their heads rotated 45 degrees laterally to the right side. At the end of the operation, patients were turned to supine position and their IOP was measured immediately. Results: There was no difference related to demographics, duration of surgery, blood loss and fluid input data. IOP values after surgery in prone position increased significantly compared to preoperative values in both groups (p < 0.05). After surgery in prone position IOP values of the upper positioned eyes in Group II were significantly lower than Group I and lower positioned eyes in Group II (p < 0.05). Conclusion: prone positioning increases IOP. In patients with prone position with a head rotation of 45 degrees laterally, IOP in the upper positioned eye was significantly lower. (C) 2013 Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据