4.2 Article

Transient nuclear envelope rupturing during interphase in human cancer cells

期刊

NUCLEUS
卷 3, 期 1, 页码 88-100

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.4161/nucl.18954

关键词

nuclear envelope; nuclear permeability barrier; live-imaging; genomic instability; cancer

资金

  1. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [P30CA014195] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [R01GM057438] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NCI NIH HHS [P30 CA014195-36, P30 CA014195] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIGMS NIH HHS [R01 GM057438, R01 GM057438-12] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Neoplastic cells are often characterized by specific morphological abnormalities of the nuclear envelope (NE), which have been used for cancer diagnosis for more than a century. The NE is a double phospholipid bilayer that encapsulates the nuclear genome, regulates all nuclear trafficking of RNAs and proteins and prevents the passive diffusion of macromolecules between the nucleoplasm and the cytoplasm. Whether there is a consequence to the proper functioning of the cell and loss of structural integrity of the nucleus remains unclear. Using live cell imaging, we characterize a phenomenon wherein nuclei of several proliferating human cancer cell lines become temporarily ruptured during interphase. Strikingly, NE rupturing was associated with the mislocalization of nucleoplasmic and cytoplasmic proteins and, in the most extreme cases, the entrapment of cytoplasmic organelles in the nuclear interior. In addition, we observed the formation of micronuclei-like structures during interphase and the movement of chromatin out of the nuclear space. The frequency of these NE rupturing events was higher in cells in which the nuclear lamina, a network of intermediate filaments providing mechanical support to the NE, was not properly formed. Our data uncover the existence of a NE instability that has the potential to change the genomic landscape of cancer cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据