4.2 Article

Regulation of nuclear envelope permeability in cell death and survival

期刊

NUCLEUS
卷 3, 期 6, 页码 540-551

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.4161/nucl.21982

关键词

Bcl-2; calcium; Nup153; nuclear pore complex; staurosporine; apoptosis; caspases; calpains; confocal microscopy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The nuclear pore complex (NPC) mediates macromolecular exchange between nucleus and cytoplasm. It is a regulated channel whose functional properties are modulated in response to the physiological status of the cell. Identifying the factors responsible for regulating NPC activity is crucial to understand how intracellular signaling cues are integrated at the level of this channel to control nucleocytoplasmic trafficking. For proteins lacking active translocation signals the NPC acts as a molecular sieve limiting passage across the nuclear envelope (NE) to proteins with a MW below similar to 40 kD. Here, we investigate how this permeability barrier is altered in paradigms of cell death and cell survival, i.e., apoptosis induction via staurosporine, and enhanced viability via overexpression of Bcl-2. We monitor dynamic changes of the NPC's size-exclusion limit for passive diffusion by confocal time-lapse microscopy of cells undergoing apoptosis, and use different diffusion markers to determine how Bcl-2 expression affects steady-state NE permeability. We show that staurosporine triggers an immediate and gradual leakiness of the NE preceding the appearance of apoptotic hallmarks. Bcl-2 expression leads to a constitutive increase in NE permeability, and its localization at the NE is sufficient for the effect, evincing a functional role for Bcl-2 at the nuclear membrane. In both settings, NPC leakiness correlates with reduced Ca2+ in internal stores, as demonstrated by fluorometric measurements of ER/NE Ca2+ levels. By comparing two cellular models with opposite outcome these data pinpoint ER/NE Ca2+ as a general and physiologically relevant regulator of the permeability barrier function of the NPC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据