3.8 Article

Dual active layer a-IGZO TFT via homogeneous conductive layer formation by photochemical H-doping

期刊

NANOSCALE RESEARCH LETTERS
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1186/1556-276X-9-619

关键词

TFT; UV irradiation; Photochemical doping; Hydrogen donor; a-IGZO; Dual active layers

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning [2013R1A1A2064715]
  2. National Research Foundation (NRF) of the Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning [NRF-2012R1A1A1005014]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2013R1A1A2064715] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, InGaZnO (IGZO) thin film transistors (TFTs) with a dual active layer (DAL) structure are fabricated by inserting a homogeneous embedded conductive layer (HECL) in an amorphous IGZO (a-IGZO) channel with the aim of enhancing the electrical characteristics of conventional bottom-gate-structure TFTs. A highly conductive HECL (carrier concentration at 1.6 x 10(13) cm(-2), resistivity at 4.6 x 10(-3) Omega.cm, and Hall mobility at 14.6 cm(2)/Vs at room temperature) is fabricated using photochemical H-doping by irradiating UV light on an a-IGZO film. The electrical properties of the fabricated DAL TFTs are evaluated by varying the HECL length. The results reveal that carrier mobility increased proportionally with the HECL length. Further, a DAL TFT with a 60-mu m-long HECL embedded in an 80-mu m-long channel exhibits comprehensive and outstanding improvements in its electrical properties: a saturation mobility of 60.2 cm(2)/Vs, threshold voltage of 2.7 V, and subthreshold slope of 0.25 V/decade against the initial values of 19.9 cm(2)/Vs, 4.7 V, and 0.45 V/decade, respectively, for a TFT without HECL. This result confirms that the photochemically H-doped HECL significantly improves the electrical properties of DAL IGZO TFTs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据