3.8 Article

Optimization on condition of epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) nanoliposomes by response surface methodology and cellular uptake studies in Caco-2 cells

期刊

NANOSCALE RESEARCH LETTERS
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGEROPEN
DOI: 10.1186/1556-276X-9-291

关键词

EGCG; Nanoliposomes; Optimization; Response surface methodology; Stability; Cellular uptake

资金

  1. Zhejiang Provincial Engineering Laboratory of Quality Controlling Technology and Instrumentation for Marine Food
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province [LY14C200012]
  3. Zhejiang Provincial Public Technology Application Research Project [2012C22052]
  4. General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China [201310120]
  5. Hangzhou Science and Technology Development Project [20130432B66, 20120232B72]
  6. 'Five-twelfth' National Science and Technology Support Program [2011BAK10B03]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The major component in green tea polyphenols, epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG), has been demonstrated to prevent carcinogenesis. To improve the effectiveness of EGCG, liposomes were used as a carrier in this study. Reverse-phase evaporation method besides response surface methodology is a simple, rapid, and beneficial approach for liposome preparation and optimization. The optimal preparation conditions were as follows: phosphatidylcholine-to-cholesterol ratio of 4.00, EGCG concentration of 4.88 mg/mL, Tween 80 concentration of 1.08 mg/mL, and rotary evaporation temperature of 34.51A degrees C. Under these conditions, the experimental encapsulation efficiency and size of EGCG nanoliposomes were 85.79% A +/- 1.65% and 180 nm A +/- 4 nm, which were close with the predicted value. The malondialdehyde value and the release test in vitro indicated that the prepared EGCG nanoliposomes were stable and suitable for more widespread application. Furthermore, compared with free EGCG, encapsulation of EGCG enhanced its inhibitory effect on tumor cell viability at higher concentrations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据