3.8 Article

Hydrothermal evolution, optical and electrochemical properties of hierarchical porous hematite nanoarchitectures

期刊

NANOSCALE RESEARCH LETTERS
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGEROPEN
DOI: 10.1186/1556-276X-8-2

关键词

Hematite; Hierarchical nanoarchitectures; Hydrothermal; Mesoporous; Lithium-ion batteries

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21276141]
  2. State Key Laboratory of Chemical Engineering, China [SKL-ChE-12A05]
  3. Shandong Province Higher Educational Science and Technology Program, China [J10LB15]
  4. Excellent Middle-Aged and Young Scientist Award Foundation of Shandong Province, China [BS2010CL024]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hollow or porous hematite (alpha-Fe2O3) nanoarchitectures have emerged as promising crystals in the advanced materials research. In this contribution, hierarchical mesoporous alpha-Fe2O3 nanoarchitectures with a pod-like shape were synthesized via a room-temperature coprecipitation of FeCl3 and NaOH solutions, followed by a mild hydrothermal treatment (120A degrees C to 210A degrees C, 12.0 h). A formation mechanism based on the hydrothermal evolution was proposed. beta-FeOOH fibrils were assembled by the reaction-limited aggregation first, subsequent and in situ conversion led to compact pod-like alpha-Fe2O3 nanoarchitectures, and finally high-temperature, long-time hydrothermal treatment caused loose pod-like alpha-Fe2O3 nanoarchitectures via the Ostwald ripening. The as-synthesized alpha-Fe2O3 nanoarchitectures exhibit good absorbance within visible regions and also exhibit an improved performance for Li-ion storage with good rate performance, which can be attributed to the porous nature of Fe2O3 nanoarchitectures. This provides a facile, environmentally benign, and low-cost synthesis strategy for alpha-Fe2O3 crystal growth, indicating the as-prepared alpha-Fe2O3 nanoarchitectures as potential advanced functional materials for energy storage, gas sensors, photoelectrochemical water splitting, and water treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据