4.8 Article

Binder-free three-dimensional silicon/carbon nanowire networks for high performance lithium-ion battery anodes

期刊

NANO ENERGY
卷 2, 期 5, 页码 943-950

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2013.03.015

关键词

Nanowire network; Si nanowires; Lithium ion battery

资金

  1. DARPA Center on Nanoscale Science and Technology for Integrated Micro/Nano-Electromechanical Transducers (iMINT)
  2. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) N/MEMS S&T Fundamentals program [N66001-10-1-4007]
  3. National Science Foundation [ECS-0335765]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The three-dimensional (3-D) nano-architectures have attracted tremendous attention for applications in lithium-ion (Li-ion) batteries due to their unique structural advantages. In this work, we developed a facile approach to fabricate 3-D Silicon (Si) nanowire networks. By precipitation, Si nanowires spontaneously interwove with one another to form 3-D nanowire networks with large amount of micro/nano gaps, which can not only facilitate Li-ion transport but also effectively accommodate the volume change. Carbon coating was then applied on Si nanowire networks through a chemical vapor deposition (CVD) process, which not only mechanically strengthens the structure but also helps the formation of 3-D electrical conducting network. A Si/C nanowire network with a wire diameter of 75 nm and 12 wt% of carbon coating exhibits a very high specific capacity of 2300 mAh g(-1) at a rate of C/5 and a high specific capacity of around 600 mAh g(-1) at a high rate of 4.5C. Our experimental investigations showed that the cycle life of such Si/C nanowire network can be further prolonged by increasing the carbon coating content, decreasing the diameters of Si nanowires, or reducing the testing voltage window. A Si/C nanowire network with a wire diameter of 37 nm and 17 wt% carbon coating can retain 78% of the initial capacity after 60 cycles in a testing voltage window of 0.1-2 V. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据