4.5 Article

Interleukin 6 Receptor Blockade in Patients With Neuromyelitis Optica Nonresponsive to Anti-CD20 Therapy

期刊

JAMA NEUROLOGY
卷 70, 期 3, 页码 394-397

出版社

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.1246

关键词

-

资金

  1. Bayer HealthCare
  2. Novartis
  3. Biogen Idec
  4. Merck Serono
  5. sanofi-aventis
  6. Novartis Pharma
  7. Teva Pharma
  8. Chugai Pharmaceuticals
  9. Genzyme
  10. German Ministry for Education and Research (German Competence Network Multiple Sclerosis)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To report first experiences with interleukin 6 receptor inhibition in therapy-resistant neuromyelitis optica (NMO). Design: Retrospective case series. Setting: Neurology department at a tertiary referral center. Patients: Patients with an aggressive course of NMO switched to tocilizumab after failure of anti-CD20 therapy. Main Outcome Measures: Annualized relapse rate and disability progression measured by the Expanded Disability Status Scale. Results: We report 3 female patients with a median age of 39 years (range, 26-40 years) and aquaporin 4-positive NMO. All patients had been treated with different immunosuppressive and immunomodulating agents, followed by 1 to 3 cycles of rituximab. Despite complete CD20-cell depletion during rituximab therapy, the median annualized relapse rate was 3.0 (range, 2.3-3.0) and the median Expanded Disability Status Scale score increased from 5.0 (range, 4.5-7.0) to 6.5 (range, 5.07.0). After the switch to tocilizumab (median duration of therapy, 18 months), the median annualized relapse rate decreased to 0.6 (range, 0-1.3). A total of 2 relapses occurred; however, they were mild and there were no changes in clinical disability. Conclusions: Interleukin 6 receptor-blocking therapy can be effective in therapy-resistant cases of NMO. Larger controlled studies are needed to confirm the efficacy of tocilizumab. JAMA Neurol. 2013;70(3):394-397. Published online January 28, 2013. doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.1246

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据