4.1 Article

Antimicrobials and Non-Healing Wounds. Evidence, controversies and suggestions-key messages

期刊

JOURNAL OF WOUND CARE
卷 23, 期 10, 页码 477-+

出版社

MA HEALTHCARE LTD
DOI: 10.12968/jowc.2014.23.10.477

关键词

antimicrobial resistance; antibiotic resistance; antiseptic; antibiotic; topial treatment; wound healing; wound infection; non-healing wounds; chronic wounds; microbiology; biofilm; bioburden; health economics; diabetic foot ulcer; pressure ulcers; leg ulcers

资金

  1. B. Braun Medical
  2. BSN medical
  3. ConvaTec
  4. Poly Mem
  5. Flen Pharma
  6. Lohmann Rauscher
  7. Molnlycke Health Care
  8. Schulke Mayr
  9. Smith Nephew
  10. Sorbion
  11. Eucomed Advanced Wound Care Sector Group

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article constitutes an extraction of key messages originally presented in the Document:Antimicrobials and Non-Healing Wounds. Evidence, controversies and suggestions written by the European Wound Management Association (EWMA), and originally published by the Journal of Wound Care in 2013.All sections are shortened and some not included. For further details please refer to in the original document which can be downloaded via www.ewma.org.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据