期刊
JOURNAL OF WOUND CARE
卷 22, 期 8, 页码 401-406出版社
MA HEALTHCARE LTD
DOI: 10.12968/jowc.2013.22.8.401
关键词
antimicrobial dressing; povidone iodine; cost efficiency; wound pain; product selection
类别
资金
- Systagenix, manufacturers of Inadine
Here we report a product evaluation for a non-adherent, povidone-iodine (PVP-I) dressing, determining the clinical need for the product, performing a literature review, clinical evaluation and cost-analysis, and developing a recommendation. This evaluation included 20 patients who experienced dressing pain with the previous antimicrobial dressing. Two patients discontinued the evaluation and four ulcers were non-healing; the remaining wounds closed with the PVP-I dressing. Patients indicated a preference for the PVP-I dressing, primarily due to lack of dressing pain. The PVP-I dressing was also the most cost-efficient.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据