3.9 Article Proceedings Paper

Subthreshold quantitative bronchoalveolar lavage: Clinical and therapeutic implications

期刊

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181825b9f

关键词

pneumonia; ventilator; bronchoalveolar; lavage

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Quantitative bronchoalveolar lavage (qBAL) is used for accurate diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). The current study aims at defining the incidence, outcomes and therapeutic implications of false-negative (FN) qBAL. Methods: Ventilated trauma, surgery, and burn, patients suspected of VAP underwent bronchoscopic qBAL. VAP was defined as qBAL with >10(5) CFU/mL. (threshold). To identify FN BALs, blood cultures drawn concomitant with BAL (+/- 5 days of BAL) were analyzed. qBAL specimens growing <10(5) CFU/mL. (subthreshold) with blood culture identifying the same organism, without any other source, were classified as FN. Results: Over 39 months, 246 patients underwent 365 qBALs. Ninety-one specimens had no growth and 274 specimens grew 433 organisms-100 at threshold and 333 at subthreshold strength. Sixteen percent of threshold and 11% of subthreshold organisms were associated with bacteremia. Rates of bacteremia were similar across strengths of growth. Bacteremia at all strengths of growth was more common with Staphylococcal species (methicillin sensitive and resistant) and for hospital-acquired gram-negatives. Rates of bacteremia at all strengths of growth were significantly higher after the first week of hospitalization. Bacteremia worsened outcomes in both threshold group (higher mortality, p < 0.05) and subthreshold group (longer lengths of stay,p < 0.05). Conclusions: qBAL has 11% FN rate as measured by blood stream invasion. Propensity of blood stream invasion is related to species of organism (Staphylococcal species and hospital-acquired gram-negatives) and duration of hospitalization, but not to strength of growth. Isolation of these organisms in BAL, at any strength, after the first week should prompt strong consideration for antimicrobial therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据