4.3 Article

Relationships of interannual variability between the equatorial pacific and tropical Indian Ocean in 17 CMIP5 models

期刊

JOURNAL OF OCEAN UNIVERSITY OF CHINA
卷 12, 期 2, 页码 237-244

出版社

OCEAN UNIV CHINA
DOI: 10.1007/s11802-013-2195-8

关键词

Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5; sea surface temperature; El Nino-Southern Oscillation; tropical Indian Ocean; tropical Pacific Ocean; interannual variability

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2012CB955602, 2012CB955603]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [41176006, 40921004, 41106010]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Seventeen coupled general circulation models from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) are employed to assess the relationships of interannual variations of sea surface temperature (SST) between the tropical Pacific (TP) and tropical Indian Ocean (TIO). The eastern/central equatorial Pacific features the strongest SST interannual variability in the models except for the model CSIRO-Mk3-6-0, and the simulated maximum and minimum are produced by models GFDL-ESM2M and GISS-E2-H respectively. However, It remains a challenge for these models to simulate the correct climate mean SST with the warm pool-cold tongue structure in the equatorial Pacific. Almost all models reproduce El Nio-Southern Oscillation (ENSO), Indian Ocean Dipole mode (IOD) and Indian Ocean Basin-wide mode (IOB) together with their seasonal phase lock features being simulated; but the relationship between the ENSO and IOD is different for different models. Consistent with the observation, an Indian Ocean basin-wide warming (cooling) takes place over the tropical Indian Ocean in the spring following an El Nio (La Nia) in almost all the models. In some models (e.g., GFDL-ESM2G and MIROC5), positive ENSO and IOB events are stronger than the negative events as shown in the observation. However, this asymmetry is reversed in some other models (e.g., HadGEM2-CC and HadGEM2-ES).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据