4.3 Article

Alterations of Colonic Contractility in Long-term Diabetic Rat Model

期刊

出版社

KOREAN SOC NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY & MOTILITY
DOI: 10.5056/jnm.2011.17.4.372

关键词

Colon; Diabetes mellitus; Gastrointestinal motility; Interstitial cells of Cajal

资金

  1. Korean Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, Korea [KRF-2006-00008]
  2. Korea Research Foundation
  3. Korean Government (MOEHRD)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background/Aims Dysfunction of the gastrointestinal tract occurs in about 76% of patients who are diabetic for more than 10 years. Although diabetes-related dysfunctions of the stomach such as gastroparesis have been extensively studied over the recent years, studies about the mechanism underlying colonic symptoms in long-term diabetes models are rare. Therefore, the goal of our study was to clarify the nature of colonic dysfunction in a long-term diabetic rat model. Methods The characteristics of colonic smooth muscle were investigated in Otsuka Long-Evans Tokushima Fatty (OLETF) rats, an animal model of type 2 diabetes. These results were compared to those obtained from Long-Evans Tokushima Otsuka (LETO) control rats. Results Spontaneous contractility of the proximal colon was significantly decreased in the diabetic rats compared to the controls, while the spontaneous contractility of the distal colon was not. The number of interstitial cells of Cajal networks in the proximal colon was greatly decreased in diabetic rats compared to the controls. Contractility of the proximal colon in response to carbachol, an acetylcholine receptor agonist, was significantly weaker in the diabetic rats. In addition, the degree of relaxation in response to nitric oxide in the proximal colon of diabetic rats also appeared to be attenuated. Conclusions The results from our study suggest that the decrease of interstitial cells of Cajal network, cholinergic receptors, and neuronal nitric oxide synthase in the proximal colon plays important roles in diabetes-related dysfunction of colon.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据