4.3 Article

Mobility ratio, relative permeability and sweep efficiency of supercritical CO2 and methane injection to enhance natural gas and condensate recovery: Coreflooding experimentation

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse.2012.05.011

关键词

Mobility ratio; Relative permeability; Sweep efficiency; CO2 and CH4 injection; Gas condensate reservoirs

资金

  1. Woodside Co.
  2. Shell Australia Exploration and Development
  3. Petroleum Development Oman

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Enhanced natural gas and condensate recovery has more recently stimulated an immense popular interest in oil exploration and production. While numerous laboratory and computational studies of carbon dioxide (CO2) injection into conventional oil reservoirs have been reported in the open literature, scarce work is being disclosed on CO2 displacement characteristics with both natural gas and liquid condensate where the displacement mechanisms are well-known to be significantly different to those in conventional gas/oil systems. This paper quantitatively investigates the recovery efficiency, pattern behavior and relative permeability of: (1) condensate following supercritical carbon dioxide (SCCO2) injection, methane injection and the injection of their mixtures; and (2) natural gas of various compositions following pure SCCO2 injection. This investigation includes two sets of coreflooding experiments: the first is to observe the microscale displacement efficiency and stability of natural gas following pure SCCO2 injection while the second was conducted to study the percentage of condensate recovery following the injection of different SCCO2-methane concentrations. This work is part of an integrated enhanced natural gas and condensate recovery project conducted for a local reservoir in Western Australia. This data will help the operators develop operational and design strategies for their current and future EOR projects, as well as provide parameters for full-field simulation practices. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据