4.7 Article

Quantifying size-dependent interactions between fluorescently labeled polystyrene nanoparticles and mammalian cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF NANOBIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
DOI: 10.1186/1477-3155-10-39

关键词

Bio-nanotechnology; Cellular uptake; Nanoparticles; Single particle tracking

资金

  1. EU [IST-2005-033700]
  2. Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) RFP [09/RFP/MTR2425]
  3. SFI [09/IN.1/B2604]
  4. Portuguese Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/15892/2005]
  5. Irish Research Council for Science, Engineering and Technology
  6. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/15892/2005] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Nanoparticles (NPs) are currently used in a wide variety of fields such as technology, medicine and industry. Due to the novelty of these applications and to ensure their success, a precise characterization of the interactions between NPs and cells is essential. Findings: The current study explores the uptake of polystyrene NPs by 1321N1 human astrocytoma and A549 human lung carcinoma cell lines. In this work we show for the first time a comparison of the uptake rates of fluorescently labeled carboxylated polystyrene (PS) NPs of different sizes (20, 40 and 100 nm) in two different cell types, keeping the number of NPs per unit volume constant for all sizes. We propose a reliable methodology to control the dose of fluorescently labeled NPs, by counting individual NPs using automated particle detection from 3D confocal microscopy images. The possibility of detecting individual NPs also allowed us to calculate the size of each nanoparticle and compare the fluorescence of single NPs across different sizes, thereby providing a robust platform for normalization of NP internalization experiments as measured by flow cytometry. Conclusions: Our findings show that 40 nm NPs are internalized faster than 20 nm or 100 nm particles in both cell lines studied, suggesting that there is a privileged size gap in which the internalization of NPs is higher.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据