4.7 Article

Challenges in ecosystem services governance: Multi-levels, multi-actors, multi-rationalities

期刊

ECOSYSTEM SERVICES
卷 16, 期 -, 页码 150-157

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.11.002

关键词

Ecosystem services; Governance; Institutions; Multi-level governance; Policy instruments; Actors; Values; Science-policy interface

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The emergence of the concept of ecosystem services has resulted in a paradigm shift in the ethical and political foundations of biodiversity conservation, from conserving nature due to its intrinsic value to an emphasis on anthropocentric use values. This paradigm shift has been accompanied by changes in the governance of natural resources over the past two decades. A recent trend in governance is the increased inclusion of multiple actors. A shift is taking place in which cooperation with other governmental levels, civil society, and private sector actors are being favoured over more traditional, state-centred governance. However, this new governance faces various challenges due to the specificities of ecosystem services and biodiversity. For one, ecosystem service beneficiaries and providers are dispersed vertically at multiple governance levels and horizontally across sectors. Furthermore, there is a lack of coordinated participation among the various actors, value judgments lack transparency, property rights are often poorly defined, and there are gaps in relevant scientific knowledge. Building on a literature review and the outcome of three international workshops, this introductory paper to the special issue on Governance of Ecosystem Services aims to identify and frame the key challenges within ecosystem services governance. This article sets the stage thematically for the collection of empirical contributions that shed further light on the matter and which discuss and contribute to the science and policy discourses on critical issues and challenges for ecosystem service governance, including the science-policy interface. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据