4.6 Article

Individual Ohmic contacted ZnO/Zn2SnO4 radial heterostructured nanowires as photodetectors with a broad-spectral-response: injection of electrons into/from interface states

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY C
卷 2, 期 10, 页码 1808-1814

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c3tc32059f

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51162023, 21263013, 51002073, 21001062]
  2. Project for Young Scientist Training of Jiangxi Province [20133BCB23002]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province [20132BAB206005]
  4. Foundation of Jiangxi Educational Committee [GJJ13058]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ZnO and Zn2SnO4 nanowires (NWs) have relatively high sensitivities as ultraviolet (UV) photodetectors, while their bandgaps are an important limitation in their applications in the visible (VIS) and near-infrared (NIR) ranges. In this paper, we demonstrate the promising applications of Ohmic contacted individual Zn2SnO4-sheathed ZnO core/shell radial heterostructured NWs as high performance solar blind UV-VIS-NIR photodetectors with a relatively high sensitivity, stability, and reproducibility. The dominant mechanism for the excellent photoconductivity is attributed to the presence of interface states in the II-type heterostructure, which prevents the movement of charge at the heterointerface. Upon applying a negative bias voltage at one end of the detector, where the interface states will be filled, potential barriers will decrease and be eliminated. Therefore, photogenerated electron-hole pairs will be separated efficiently and electrons can migrate towards the Zn2SnO4 shell, resulting in a huge decrease in shell resistance. The absorption of the heterointerface and charged oxygen vacancies (V(O)(+)and V-O(++)) in the depletion region can induce VIS and NIR photoresponses. These results demonstrate that individual heterostructured NWs composed of wide bandgap semiconductors can indeed serve as high-performance photodetectors in the solar blind UV-VIS-NIR range.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据