4.6 Article

High work-function hole transport layers by self-assembly using a fluorinated additive

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY C
卷 2, 期 1, 页码 115-123

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c3tc30973h

关键词

-

资金

  1. US Department of Energy EERE Solar America Initiative [DE-FG3608GO18018]
  2. DOE Office of Basic Energy Sciences and Los Alamos National Laboratory [DE-AC52-06NA25396]
  3. U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory [DE-AC52-07NA27344]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The hole transport polymer poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):poly(4-styrenesulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS) derives many of its favorable properties from a PSS-rich interfacial layer that forms spontaneously during coating. Since PEDOT: PSS is only usable as a blend it is not possible to study PEDOT: PSS without this interfacial layer. Through the use of the self-doped polymer sulfonated poly(thiophene-3-[2-(2-methoxyethoxy) ethoxy]-2,5-diyl) (S-P3MEET) and a polyfluorinated ionomer (PFI) it is possible to compare transparent conducting organic films with and without interfacial layers and to understand their function. Using neutron reflectometry, we show that PFI preferentially segregates at the top surface of the film during coating and forms a thermally-stable surface layer. Because of this distribution we find that even small amounts of PFI increase the electron work function of the hole transport layer. We also find that annealing at 150 degrees C and above reduces the work function compared to samples heated at lower temperatures. Using near edge X-ray absorption fine structure spectroscopy and gas chromatography we show that this reduction in work function is due to S-P3MEET being doped by PFI. Organic photovoltaic devices with S-P3MEET/PFI hole transport layers yield higher power conversion efficiency than devices with pure S-P3MEET or PEDOT: PSS hole transport layers. Additionally, devices with a doped interface layer of S-P3MEET/PFI show superior performance to those with un-doped S-P3MEET.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据