4.6 Article

Naphtalenediimide-based donor-acceptor copolymer prepared by chain-growth catalysttransfer polycondensation: evaluation of electrontransporting properties and application in printed polymer transistors

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY C
卷 2, 期 26, 页码 5149-5154

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c4tc00390j

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Commission [FP7-287568]
  2. DFG [1355]
  3. DFG within the German Excellence Initiative via the Cluster of Excellence EXC 1056 Center for Advancing Electronics Dresden (cfAED)
  4. KAU

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The semiconducting properties of a bithiophene-naphthalene diimide copolymer (PNDIT2) prepared by Ni-catalyzed chain-growth polycondensation (P1) and commercially available N2200 synthesized by Pdcatalyzed step-growth polycondensation were compared. Both polymers show similar electron mobility of similar to 0.2 cm(2) V-1 s(-1), as measured in top-gate OFETs with Au source/drain electrodes. It is noteworthy that the new synthesis has several technological advantages compared to traditional Stille polycondensation, as it proceeds rapidly at room temperature and does not involve toxic tin-based monomers. Furthermore, a step forward to fully printed polymeric devices was achieved. To this end, transistors with PEDOT: PSS source/drain electrodes were fabricated on plastic foils by means of mass printing technologies in a roll-to-roll printing press. Surface treatment of the printed electrodes with PEIE, which reduces the work function of PEDOT: PSS, was essential to lower the threshold voltage and achieve high electron mobility. Fully polymeric P1 and N2200-based OFETs achieved average linear and saturation FET mobilities of > 0.08 cm(2) V-1 s(-1). Hence, the performance of n-type, plastic OFET devices prepared in ambient laboratory conditions approaches those achieved by more sophisticated and expensive technologies, utilizing gold electrodes and time/energy consuming thermal annealing and lithographic steps.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据