期刊
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES
卷 13, 期 -, 页码 162-172出版社
ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.03.005
关键词
Ecosystem services mapping; Cascade model; Decision-making; Ecosystem services framework
资金
- projects FONDECYT (CONICYT-Chile) [1110741]
- Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI) [CRN3095]
- US National Science Foundation [GEO-1128040]
- FONCYT [PICT 12-0607]
- VESPLAN [CYTED Red 413RT0472]
- Directorate For Geosciences
- ICER [GRANTS:13723703] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
- ICER
- Directorate For Geosciences [1128040] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
The literature on ecosystem services mapping presents a diversity of procedures whose consistency might question the reliability of maps for decision making This study aims at analyzing the correspondence between the purpose of maps (e.g. land use planning) and the procedures used for mapping (e.g. benefit transfer, ecological transfer). Fifty scientific studies published between 2005 and 2012 were selected and analyzed according to 19 variables, applying independence tests over contingency tables, ANOVA and regression analysis. The results show that most studies declared a decision-making purpose (82%), which in 50% of the cases, was land use planning. Only few relationships were found between variables selected to describe the purpose of the maps and those selected to describe the mapping procedures. Thus for example, maps aimed at supporting land use planning did not include any level of stakeholder participation or scenario analysis, as it would have been expected given this purpose. Likewise, maps were based on either economic value or biophysical transfers, regardless of the spatial and temporal scales of mapping. This generally weak relation between map's purposes with the used procedures could explain the still restricted incidence of ES on decision-making by limiting the transmission, comparison and synthesis of results. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据